Incident context
Associate relevant vehicle and journey records with available video and the reported event. Preserve timestamps, source references and gaps in the evidence.
Explore how authorised vehicle, journey and video information can support incident review, coaching and fleet risk services.
Discuss this programmeRisk teams need evidence with clear provenance and an understood purpose. Fleetly can be part of an agreed workflow that connects fleet context, available media and documented review outcomes. The value lies in a consistent investigation and follow-up process—not in treating an automated score as a final judgement.
Associate relevant vehicle and journey records with available video and the reported event. Preserve timestamps, source references and gaps in the evidence.
Separate device detections, automated analysis and the reviewer’s conclusion. Record confirmed, dismissed and inconclusive outcomes with a reason.
Use reviewed behaviours to agree proportionate follow-up with fleet teams. Measure sustained change over comparable driving exposure rather than raw event counts alone.
Agree the purpose, permitted recipients and access to each evidence type. Share only information needed for the authorised workflow and define how records will be retained and handled.
Use this proposed responsibility model to shape the discussion. Final obligations and service levels are defined in the agreement.
Define the service and authorised evidence requirements.
Assess available fleet data and access arrangements.
Customer authorisation, permitted use and recipient roles.
Provide domain expertise and own the agreed professional assessment.
Provide agreed platform context and evidence workflows.
Review methods, uncertainty and responsibility for decisions.
Coordinate agreed claims, risk or coaching actions.
Support the scoped fleet workflow and technical service.
Measurement, retention and escalation responsibilities.
Select a stage to explore the onboarding approach.
Describe the review or risk service and the information it requires.
Describe the review or risk service and the information it requires.
Confirm authorised parties, source coverage and data-handling responsibilities.
Review complete, missing and inconclusive evidence scenarios.
Assess process quality and follow-through using agreed measures.
Use this checklist to prepare a useful introduction. You can start a conversation even if some items are still to be discussed.
A preparation aid, not partner approval. Selections stay in this page session.
Or email uk@intelexsystems.com.
No. Pricing and coverage decisions remain with the relevant insurer. This programme does not promise premium reductions or claims outcomes.
No. Automated analysis is one input and must not be presented as a determination of legal responsibility.
Only the information authorised for the agreed purpose should be shared through approved access and handling arrangements.
Use a defined baseline, equivalent exposure and consistent review methods. Separate process improvements from confirmed reductions in incidents or cost.
Programme participation, product access, branding permissions, commercial arrangements and service responsibilities are confirmed for each relationship. These pages do not establish a partner appointment or guarantee commercial outcomes.